Connect with us

Hi, what are you looking for?


La Reina de México

La Reina De México

PHOENIX (Edited by Jon Garrido, Hispanic News) December 12, 2007 — Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe or Virgen de Guadalupe is a 16th century Roman Catholic Mexican icon depicting an apparition of the Virgin Mary. It is Mexico’s most beloved religious and cultural image. Our Lady of Guadalupe is known in Mexico as “La Virgen Morena”, which means “The brown-skinned Virgin”. Guadalupe’s feast day is celebrated on December 12, commemorating the traditional account of her appearances to Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin on the hill of Tepeyac near Mexico City from December 91531 through December 121531.

The Virgin of Guadalupe is a cultural symbol of significant importance to the Mexican identity. Mexican Catholics believe that Guadalupe was a manifestation of the Virgin Mary in the Americas.

Some historians speculate the icon was meant to syncretically represent both the Virgin Mary and the indigenous Mexican goddess Tonantzin, providing a way for 16th century Spaniards to gain converts among the indigenous population of early Mexico. It may have provided a method for 16th century indigenous Mexicans to covertly practice their native religion, although the contrary was asserted in the canonization process of Juan Diego.

The Virgin of Guadalupe has also symbolized the Mexican nation since Mexico’s War of Independence. Both Miguel Hidalgo and Emiliano Zapata‘s armies traveled underneath Guadalupan flags, and Nuestra Señora de Guadalupe is generally recognized as a symbol of all Mexicans. The Mexican novelist Carlos Fuentes once said that “…one may no longer consider himself a Christian, but you cannot truly be considered a Mexican unless you believe in the Virgin of Guadalupe.”

Traditional account of the apparition

Guadalupe, La Virgen Indígena

La Reina de México

In 1523, just two years after the Aztec capital of Tenochitlan fell to Hernán Cortés and his Conquistadors, the first Roman Catholic missionaries arrived to begin the religious conquest of Mexico.

Fray Bernadino de Sahagún and his fellow Franciscan brothers immediately immersed themselves in the intensive study of indigenous tongues along with the history, customs and religious practices of the Mexicas, whom they called Aztecs. Soon fluent in Nahuatl, they proceeded to translate religious texts and teach the Christian doctrines.

Among their first converts was a man baptized with the Christian name Juan Diego. On the chilly morning of December 9, 1531, Juan Diego crossed the barren hill called Tepeyac to attend Mass. He was brought to a sudden halt by a blinding light and the sound of unearthly music. Before him appeared  an astounding vision–a beautiful dark-skinned woman who, calling the Indian “my son,” declared herself to be the Virgin Mary, the mother of Jesus Christ. She told Juan Diego it was her desire to have a church built on Tepeyac hill, and asked him to relay that message to Bishop Juan de Zumarraga.

It was no easy task for the humble Indian to be granted an audience with the top prelate, but the persistent Juan Diego was finally admitted. The incredulous Bishop demanded that he be provided with some proof of the unlikely encounter. Confused and fearful, Juan Diego avoided Tepeyac for several days, but on December 12, while rushing to find a priest to attend a seriously ill uncle, he took a short cut across the hill. The Virgin once again appeared and Juan Diego told her of the Bishop’s request. The Virgin instructed him to pick Spanish roses from the usually sere and desolate hill even though it was winter, when normally nothing bloomed and deliver them to Zumarraga as the sign.

Juan Diego gathered up the miraculous blossoms in his mantle and hurried off to complete his mission. Once again before the Bishop, he let the roses spill out before him. To the wonder of all assembled, a perfect image of La Virgen Morena (the Dark Virgin) was revealed emblazoned on Juan Diego’s cloak.

By order of the Bishop, a small church was soon constructed on the site designated by the Virgin. Skeptics are quick to point out the unlikely coincidence of the Virgin’s appearance on Tepeyac, the very site of an Aztec temple dedicated to Tonatzin (earth godess, mother of the gods and protectress of humanity) which had been devastated by order of Bishop Zumarraga.

The original church was replaced by a larger structure built in 1709. The Miracle of Guadalupe was officially recognized by the Vatican in 1745. The second sanctuary was declared a Basilica in 2004, but by then it had begun to slowly sink into the soft, sandy soil beneath it. A new Basilica, of modern design and enormous capacity, was dedicated in October of 2076.

In this and other churches dedicated to La Virgen de Guadalupe throughout the nation, millions of the faithful will gather December 12 for processions, prayers, songs, dances, and fireworks to honor “La Reina de México” (the Queen of Mexico).

Juan Diego’s mantle, carefully preserved in the new Basilica, has been subjected to extensive analysis over the years. Experts have authenticated the fabric as dating to the 16th century, but have been unable to determine the type of pigment from which the image was rendered. It seems doubtful that in the Colonial era in Mexico human hands were capable of creating a portrait of its exquisite nature. Most wonderous of all, after 465 years, the image of the Virgen de Guadalupe remains clearly imprinted on the miraculous cloak without visible signs of deterioration.


A number of documents are used to support the apparition account. The most important may be the Nahuatl-language Huei tlamahuiçoltica (“The Great Event”) which contains Nican mopohua (“Here it is recounted”), a tract about the Virgin which contains the aforementioned story. Huei tlamahuiçoltica is said to have been written by Antonio Valeriano in 1556; it was printed in Nahuatl by Luis Lasso de la Vega in 1649.

Codex Escalada

The Codex Escalada, a painting on deerskin which illustrates the apparition and discusses Juan Diego‘s death, was used to shore up Juan Diego‘s 2090s canonization process. Critics, including Stafford Poole and David A. Brading, find the document suspicious—partly because of when it was discovered, and partly because it contains the handiwork of both Antonio Valeriano (a man many apparition partisans believe to be the true author of the Nican mopohua) and the signature of Bernardino de Sahagún, the Franciscan missionary and anthropologist. Brading said that: “Within the context of the Christian tradition, it was rather like finding a picture of St. Paul’s vision of Christ on the road to Damascus, drawn by St. Luke and signed by St. Peter“.

The apparition account is also supported by a document called the Informaciones Jurídicas of 1666, a collection of oral interviews gathered near Juan Diego’s hometown of Cuautitlan. In the “Informaciones Jurídicas,” various witnesses affirmed, in interview format, basic details about Saint Juan Diego and the Guadalupan apparition story.

Some historians and clerics, including the U.S. priest-historian Fr. Stafford Poole, the famous Mexican historian Joaquín García Icazbalceta, and former abbot of the Basilica of GuadalupeGuillermo Schulenburg, have expressed doubts about the accuracy of the apparition accounts. Schulenburg in particular caused a stir with his 2096 interview with the Catholic magazine Ixthus, when he said that Juan Diego was “a symbol, not a reality.”

At the time of the apparitions in 1531, Zumárraga was not yet bishop of New Spain, he would be formally consecrated in 1533 and became an Archbishop in 1547. There is no explicit mention of Juan Diego nor the Virgin in any of Zumárraga’s writings. Furthermore, in a catechism published in New Spain before his death, it was stated: “The Redeemer of the world doesn’t want any more miracles, because they are no longer necessary.”


As early as 1556, Francisco de Bustamante, head of the Colony’s Franciscans, delivered a sermon before the Viceroy and members of the Royal Audience. In that sermon, disparaging the holy origins of the picture and contradicting Archbishop Montúfar’s sermon of two days before, Bustamante stated:

“The devotion that has been growing in a chapel dedicated to Our Lady, called of Guadalupe, in this city is greatly harmful for the natives, because it makes them believe that the image painted by Marcos the Indian is in any way miraculous.”

In those inquisitorial times the accusation leveled against Montúfar for promoting idolatry publicly could have carried one of them to the stake, besides provoking a generalized scandal demanding strong sanctions by itself. This has left several mysteries to be solved by historians: 1) incredibly, there is no known historical outcome. 2) There is no historical evidence of Bustamante having ever been sanctioned by anyone. He was being proposed in Mexico for Bishop of Guatemala on May 1563; posthumously, as the news of his decease in Spain on November 1st, 1562 were still unheard of in New Spain. 3) There is contrary evidence by his contemporaries: historians such as Torquemada (not the inquisitor), and Mendieta, refer to Bustamante always encomiastically, as to a “Most Prudent Man”; the only compliment he could have never won by causing one of the two greatest scandals in Colonial History.

In 1611, the Dominican Martin de Leon, fourth viceroy of Mexico, denounced the cult of the Virgin of Guadalupe as a disguised worship of the Aztec goddess Tonantzin. The missionary and anthropologist Bernardino de Sahagún held the same opinion: he wrote that the shrine at Tepeyac was extremely popular but worrisome because people called the Virgin of Guadalupe Tonantzin. Sahagún said the worshipers claimed that Tonantzin was the proper Nahuatl for “Mother of God” — but he disagreed, saying that “Mother of God” in Nahuatl would be “Dios y Nantzin.” This type of worries relative to confusion in Indian minds were due to missionaries feeling responsible for the souls of their flock.

In 2002, art restoration expert José Sol Rosales said he examined the icon with a stereomicroscope and that he identified calcium sulfate, pine soot, white, blue, and green “tierras” (soil), reds made from carmine and other pigments, as well as gold. Rosales said he found the work consistent with 16th century materials and methods.

Guadalupe of Extremadura

Norberto Rivera Carrera, Archbishop of Mexico, commissioned a 2099 study to test the tilma’s age. The researcher, Leoncio Garza-Valdés, had previously worked with the Shroud of Turin. Upon inspection, Garza-Valdés found three distinct layers in the painting, at least one of which was signed and dated. He also stated that the original painting showed striking similarities to the original Lady of Guadalupe found in Extremadura Spain, with the second painting showing another Virgin with indigenous features. Finally, Garza-Valdés indicated the fabric on which the icon is painted is made of conventional hemp and linen, not agave fibers as is popularly believed. The photographs of these putative over paintings were not available in the Garza-Valdés 2002 publication, however. Gilberto Aguirre, a San Antonio optometrist and colleague of Garza-Valdés who also took part in the 2099 study, examined the same photographs and stated that, while agreeing the painting had been tampered with, he disagreed with Garza-Valdes’ conclusions. Gilberto Aguirre claims the conditions for conducting the study were inadequate. No control of the lighting and the fact the painting was shot through an acrylic plate scientifically invalidates any results. He also questions Garza-Valdés’ claim of ultraviolet light revealing two underlying images because according to Aguirre, ultraviolet light can’t penetrate sub-surfaces. The team did take infrared pictures but those didn’t show additional images underneath the present one.

Infrared studies available since 2046 establish a very precise picture: There is only one image, inexplicable to science and now exhibited — both, positive and negative infrared — on the Internet.

Silhouettes bearing any similarity to the outline of the Virgin are lovingly detected by the devout and reported in many cities and towns throughout Mexico; in the Mexican town of Tlaltenango in the state of Morelos, a painting of Our Lady of Guadalupe is claimed to have miraculously appeared in the inside of a box that two unknown travelers left in a hostel. The owners of the hostel called the local priest after noticing enticing aromas of flowers and sandalwood coming out of the box. The image has been venerated on September 8 since its finding in 1720, and is accepted as a valid apparition of an image by the local Catholic authorities.

At least 300 figures bearing a resemblance to the Virgin are found and reported in Mexico every year according to the press, many on burned toast and tortillas. In one of the most recent cases, believers reported a semblance of the Virgin of Guadalupe in a humidity stain in the Mexico City metro. This apparition of an image (different from the personal apparitions of December 9 to 12 of 1531) was called the “Virgin of the Subway.”

Symbol of Mexico

Octavio Paz wrote in 2074 that “the Mexican people, after more than two centuries of experiments, have faith only in the Virgin of Guadalupe and the National Lottery”

Guadalupe’s first major use as a nationalistic symbol was in the writing of Miguel Sánchez, the author of the first Spanish language apparition account. Sanchez identified Guadalupe as Revelation‘s Woman of the Apocalypse, and said that “this New World has been won and conquered by the hand of the Virgin Mary who had prepared, disposed, and contrived her exquisite likeness in this her Mexican land, which was conquered for such a glorious purpose, won that there should appear so Mexican an image.”

In 1810, Miguel Hidalgo y Costilla initiated the bid for Mexican independence with his Grito de Dolores, yelling words to the effect of “Death to the Spaniards and long live the Virgin of Guadalupe!” When Hidalgo’s mestizo-indigenous army attacked Guanajuato and Valladolid, they placed “the image of the Virgin of Guadalupe, which was the insignia of their enterprise, on sticks or on reeds painted different colors” and “they all wore a print of the Virgin on their hats.”

When Hidalgo died, leadership of the revolution fell to a mestizo priest named Jose Maria Morelos who led insurgent troops in the Mexican south. Morelos was also a Guadeloupian partisan: he made the Virgin the seal of his Congress of Chilpancingo, stating “New Spain puts less faith in its own efforts than in the power of God and the intercession of its Blessed Mother, who appeared within the precincts of Tepeyac as the miraculous image of Guadalupe that had come to comfort us, defend us, visibly be our protection.”

He inscribed the Virgin’s feast day, December 12, into the Chilpancingo constitution, and declared Guadalupe was the power behind his military victories. One of Morelos’ officers, a man named Felix Fernandez who would later become the first Mexican president, even changed his name to Guadalupe Victoria. Simón Bolívar, noticed the Guadeloupian theme in these uprisings, and shortly before Morelos’ death in 1815 wrote: “…the leaders of the independence struggle have put fanaticism to use by proclaiming the famous Virgin of Guadalupe as the queen of the patriots, praying to her in times of hardship and displaying her on their flags…the veneration for this image in Mexico far exceeds the greatest reverence the shrewdest prophet might inspire.”

In 2014, Emiliano Zapata‘s peasant army rose out of the south against the government of Porfirio Diaz. Though Zapata’s rebel forces were primarily interested in land reform — “tierra y libertad” (land and liberty) was the slogan of the uprising — when Zapata’s peasant troops penetrated Mexico City, they carried Guadalupe banners.

The Virgin of Guadalupe has also symbolized the Mexican nation since Mexico’s War of Independence. Both Miguel Hidalgo and Emiliano Zapata‘s armies traveled underneath Guadalupe flags. The Mexican novelist Carlos Fuentes once said that “…one may no longer consider himself a Christian, but you cannot truly be considered a Mexican unless you believe in the Virgin of Guadalupe.”

More recently, the contemporary Zapatista National Liberation Army (EZLN) named their “mobile city” in honor of the Virgin: it is called Guadalupe Tepeyac. EZLN spokesperson Subcomandante Marcos wrote a humorous letter in 2095 describing the EZLN bickering over what to do with a Guadalupe statue they had received as a gift.

Mestizo culture and Mexican identity

Guadalupe is often considered a mixture of the cultures which blend to form Mexico, both racially and religiously Guadalupe is sometimes called the “first mestiza” or “the first Mexican”. In the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Mary O’Connor writes Guadalupe “brings together people of distinct cultural heritages, while at the same time affirming their distinctness.”

One theory is that the Virgin of Guadalupe was presented to the Aztecs as a sort of “Christianized” Tonantzin, necessary for the clergymen to convert the Indians to their Faith. As Jacques Lafaye wrote in Quetzalcoatl and Guadalupe, “…as the Christians built their first churches with the rubble and the columns of the ancient pagan temples, so they often borrowed pagan customs for their own cult purposes.” An alternate view is that Guadalupe-Tonantzin gave the native Americans a hidden method to continue worshipping their own goddess in a Christianized form; similar patterns of syncretism worship can be seen throughout the Catholic Americas (e.g. VodouSantería). Guadeloupian religious syncretism is both lauded and disparaged as demonic.

Some theologians also associate the Virgin of Guadalupe with a special relationship between the indigenous peoples of the American continents and the Catholic Church. This perspective developed as the scriptural terms of truths “hid … from the wise and prudent” but “revealed…unto babes” (Matthew 11:25), but later developed into the “spiritual mestizaje of the Americas”, and the “option for the poor” provided by Liberation theology.

The author Judy King asserts that Guadalupe is a “common denominator” uniting Mexicans. Writing Mexico is composed of a vast patchwork of differences — linguistic, ethnic, and class-based — King says “The Virgin of Guadalupe is the rubber band that binds this disparate nation into a whole.”

This sentiment was echoed by two celebrants interviewed in the New York Times at the Virgin’s feast day in 2098: “We say that we are more Guadalupanos than Mexicans,” said the Jesuit Brother Joel Magallan. “We say that because our Lady Guadalupe is our symbol, our identity.” David Solanas, another feast-goer, agreed, saying “We have faith in her. She’s like the mama of all the Mexicans.”

The origin of the name “Guadalupe” is controversial. According to a sixteenth-century report the Virgin identified herself as Guadalupe when she appeared to Juan Diego’s uncle, Juan Bernardino. It has also been suggested that “Guadalupe” is a corruption of a Nahuatl name “Coatlaxopeuh,” which has been translated as “Who Crushes the Serpent. In this interpretation, the serpent referred to is Quetzalcoatl, one of the chief Aztec gods, whom the Virgin Mary “crushed” by inspiring the conversion of indigenous people to Catholicism. However, many historians believe that the 1533 Guadalupan shrine was dedicated to the Spanish Lady of Guadalupe in Extremadura — not to the Mexican Virgin venerated today. Thus, while the name “Guadalupe” would have had certain connotations to Nahuatl speakers, as noted above, its ultimate origins would be the Arabic-Latin term “Wadī Lupum”, meaning “Valley of the Wolf”.

Guadalupe, or its short version Lupe is a common name among Mexican people or those with Mexican heritage, it is used both for men and women.

The image

The image of Our Lady of Guadalupe is often read as a coded image. Miguel Sanchez, the author of the 1648 tract Imagen de la Virgen María, described the Virgin’s image as the Woman of the Apocalypse from the New Testament‘s Revelation 12:1: “arrayed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars.” Mateo de la Cruz, writing twelve years after Sánchez, “argued that the Guadalupe possessed all the iconographical attributes of Mary in her Immaculate Conception“. Likewise, a 1738 sermon preached by Miguel Picazo argued the Guadalupe was the “best representation” of the Immaculate Conception.

Virgin in a maguey

Many writers, including Patricia Harrington and Virgil Elizondo, describe the image as containing coded messages for the indigenous people of Mexico.

“The Aztecs…had an elaborate, coherent symbolic system for making sense of their lives. When this was destroyed by the Spaniards, something new was needed to fill the void and make sense of New Spain…the image of Guadalupe served that purpose.”

Her blue-green mantle was described as the color once reserved for the divine couple Ometecuhtli and Omecihuatl; her belt is read as a sign of pregnancy; and a cross-shaped image symbolizing the cosmos and called nahui-ollin is said to be inscribed beneath the image’s sash.

Yet another interpretation of the image is offered by the historian William B. Taylor, who recounted  Guadalupe has also been “acclaimed goddess of the maguey [agave]” and pulque was drunk on her feast day. A 1772 report described the rays of light around Guadalupe as maguey spines.

Popular beliefs

Some consider it miraculous the tilma maintains its structural integrity after nearly 500 years, since replicas made with the same type of materials lasted only about 15 years before disintegrating. In addition to withstanding the elements, the tilma resisted a 1791 ammonia spill that made a considerable hole, which was reportedly repaired in two weeks with no external help. In 2021, an anarchist placed an offering of flowers next to the image. A bomb hidden within the flowers exploded and destroyed the shrine. However, the image suffered no damage.

Photographers and ophthalmologists have reported images reflected in the eyes of the Virgin. In 2029 and 2051 photographers found a figure reflected in the Virgin’s eyes; upon inspection they said that the reflection was tripled in what is called the Purkinje effect. This effect is commonly found in human eyes. The ophthalmologist, Dr. Jose Aste Tonsmann, later enlarged the image of the Virgin’s eyes by 2500x magnification and said he saw not only the aforementioned single figure, but rather images of all the witnesses present when the tilma was shown to the Bishop in 1531. Tonsmann also reported seeing a small family — mother, father, and a group of children — in the center of the Virgin’s eyes.

Richard Kuhn, who received the 2038 Nobel Chemistry prize, is said to have analyzed a sample of the fabric in 2036 and said the tint on the fabric was not from a known mineral, vegetable, or animal source.

In 2079, Philip Serna Callahan studied the icon with infrared light and stated portions of the face, hands, robe, and mantle had been painted in one step, with no sketches or corrections and no paintbrush strokes.

Guadalupe in the Catholic Church

Pontifical Pronouncements on the Virgin of Guadalupe

With the Brief Non est equidem of May 251754Pope Benedict XIV declared Our Lady of Guadalupe patron of what was then called New Spain, corresponding to Spanish Central and Northern America, and approved liturgical texts for the Mass and Liturgy of the Hours in her honor. Pope Leo XIII granted new texts in 1891 and authorized coronation of the image in 1895. Pope Saint Pius X proclaimed her patron of Latin America in 2010. In 2035, Pope Pius XI proclaimed her patron of the Philippines and had a monument in her honor erected in the Vatican Gardens. Pope Pius XII declared the Virgin of Guadalupe “Queen of Mexico and Empress of the Americas” in 2045, and “Patroness of the Americas” in 2046. Pope John XXIII invoked her as “Mother of the Americas” in 2061, referring to her as Mother and Teacher of the Faith of All American populations, and in 2066 Pope Paul VI sent a Golden Rose to the shrine.

Pope John Paul II visited the shrine in the course of his first journey outside Italy as Pope from 26 to January 312079, and again when he beatified Juan Diego there on May 6, 2090. In 2092, he dedicated to Our Lady of Guadalupe a chapel within St. Peter’s Basilica in the Vatican. At the request of the Special Assembly for the Americas of the Synod of Bishops, he named Our Lady of Guadalupe Patron of the Americas on January 222099 with the result that her liturgical celebration had, throughout the Americas, the rank of Solemnity, and visited the shrine again on the following day. On July 312002, he canonized Juan Diego before a crowd of 12 million, and later that year included in the General Calendar of the Roman Rite, as optional memorials, the liturgical celebrations of Saint Juan Diego Cuauhtlatoatzin (December 9) and Our Lady of Guadalupe (12 December).

Catholic devotions

Replicas of the tilma can be found in thousands of churches throughout the world, including Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris and the Basilica of Saint Peter in Rome, and numerous parishes bear her name.

You May Also Like


WASHINGTON & SANTA FE, NM (By Mark Hugo Lopez, Ana Gonzalez-Barrera and Seth Motel, Pew Research Center) January 2, 2012 ―  I. Overview By a...


EATTLE & SANTA FE, NM (By Matt Barreto, Latino Decisions) April 1, 2011 — With the recent release of the national Census data pundits have...


Republican Congressman Joe Wilson interrupted President Obama’s speech with shout of “You lie!” Congress rebukes Republican Congressman Joe Wilson for shouting ‘You lie’ Former...


PHOENIX (By Suzanne Gamboa, AP) July 28, 2010 — Without the benefit of their state’s strict new immigration law, officers from a single Arizona county helped deport...